Clinical study overview
COMET was a 12-month, Phase 3, multi-center, long-term, open-label safety study assessing AUVELITY (twice daily) in 876 patients (roll-over from prior AUVELITY studies and newly enrolled) with MDD. Efficacy measures were secondary endpoints based on newly enrolled patients (n=609).1-3 See full study design
Long-term safety of AUVELITY from a study lasting up to 12 months2*
Long-term safety in the 12-month open‑label COMET study was consistent with the results observed in the controlled clinical studies.1,4-6
Common adverse events
(≥5% of AUVELITY-treated patients)4
Adverse event | AUVELITY (N=876) |
---|---|
Dizziness | 12.7% |
Nausea | 11.9% |
Headache | 8.8% |
Dry mouth | 7.1% |
Decreased appetite | 6.1% |
Discontinuation Rates
8.4% (74/876) of patients on AUVELITY discontinued study participation due to adverse events.4 The most common adverse events resulting in discontinuation were dizziness (1.5%), nausea (1.1%), headache (1.0%), anxiety (0.8%), and decreased appetite (0.6%).4
*The overall safety population includes all patients who received study medication.
Long-term efficacy was measured for AUVELITY for up to 12 months in an open-label study2,3,6
GEMINI Phase 3 study evaluated AUVELITY vs placebo in 327 patients (N=163 AUVELITY and N=164 placebo) with major depressive disorder.1,6
Data from open-label safety studies have limitations. As the study was not blinded or placebo-controlled, results should be interpreted with these factors in mind. Endpoints were analyzed descriptively, and statistical significance cannot be attributed.
In the COMET study, all newly enrolled patients were assessed for efficacy through Week 6. Only patients whose MADRS scores improved by ≥25% were eligible to continue in the study. 6% of subjects met discontinuation criteria at Week 6.
Presentation of GEMINI results are for contextual purposes only. Comparisons of the data cannot be made due to the disparate nature of the study designs.
*AUVELITY-naive ITT population.
Missing data were not imputed. Efficacy data from early termination visits were included in the summary of the next scheduled efficacy assessment visit.
Endpoint analyzed using a chi-squared test.
BID=twice a day; ITT=intention-to-treat; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
Data from open-label safety studies have limitations. As the study was not blinded or placebo-controlled, results should be interpreted with these factors in mind. Endpoints were analyzed descriptively, and statistical significance cannot be attributed.
In the COMET study, all newly enrolled patients were assessed for efficacy through Week 6. Only patients whose MADRS scores improved by ≥25% were eligible to continue in the study. 6% of subjects met discontinuation criteria at Week 6.
Presentation of GEMINI results are for contextual purposes only. Comparisons of the data cannot be made due to the disparate nature of the study designs.
*AUVELITY-naive ITT population.
Missing data were not imputed. Efficacy data from early termination visits were included in the summary of the next scheduled efficacy assessment visit.
Endpoint analyzed using a chi-squared test.
BID=twice a day; ITT=intention-to-treat; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
Data from open-label safety studies have limitations. As the study was not blinded or placebo-controlled, results should be interpreted with these factors in mind. Endpoints were analyzed descriptively, and statistical significance cannot be attributed.
In the COMET study, all newly enrolled patients were assessed for efficacy through Week 6. Only patients whose MADRS scores improved by ≥25% were eligible to continue in the study. 6% of subjects met discontinuation criteria at Week 6.
Presentation of GEMINI results are for contextual purposes only. Comparisons of the data cannot be made due to the disparate nature of the study designs.
*AUVELITY-naive ITT population.
Missing data were not imputed. Efficacy data from early termination visits were included in the summary of the next scheduled efficacy assessment visit.
Endpoint analyzed using a chi-squared test.
CGI-I=Clinical Global Impression-Improvement; ITT=intention-to-treat; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
COMET study*
Baseline mean SDS total score was 20.0 (SD=5.8).3
In the COMET study, all newly enrolled patients were assessed for efficacy through Week 6. Only patients whose MADRS scores improved by ≥25% were eligible to continue in the study. 6% of subjects met discontinuation criteria at Week 6.
Data from open-label safety studies have limitations. As the study was not blinded or placebo-controlled, results should be interpreted with these factors in mind. Endpoints were analyzed descriptively, and statistical significance cannot be attributed.
*AUVELITY-naive ITT population.
Missing data were not imputed. Efficacy data from early termination visits were included in the summary of the next scheduled efficacy assessment visit.
BID=twice a day; ITT=intention-to-treat; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; SD=standard deviation; SDS=Sheehan Disability Scale
COMET Phase 3 Study
COMET was a Phase 3, multi‑center, open‑label U.S. study. Patients with MDD were treated with Auvelity twice daily for up to 1 year. The study enrolled both patients completing a prior Auvelity study and newly enrolled patients. The trial was concluded once at least 300 patients had been treated for 6 months and at least 100 patients had been treated for 12 months, as pre‑specified. At the time of study conclusion, 597 patients had reached at least 6 months, and 110 patients had reached at least 12 months of treatment.1,2,4,9
Secondary endpoint results were based on the newly enrolled patients (n=609) and the safety results from the full population (n=876).3,4
All newly enrolled patients were assessed for efficacy through Week 6. Only subjects whose MADRS scores improved by ≥25% were eligible to continue in the study. 6% of subjects met discontinuation criteria at Week 6.
Select secondary endpoints include: Clinical remission (MADRS total score ≤10), clinical response (≥50% improvement in MADRS total score from baseline), CGI‑I, and SDS.2
Clinical response and clinical remission were assessed on the MADRS scale. The MADRS is a clinician‑rated scale used to assess depressive symptom severity. Patients are rated on 10 items to assess feelings of sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, lack of interest, pessimism, and suicidality. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.1
Key inclusion criteria for newly enrolled patients: Male or female 18‑65 years of age; met the DSM-5 criteria for current MDD without psychotic features; MADRS total score ≥25.2
Key exclusion criteria: History of seizure disorder; undergoing abrupt discontinuation of alcohol, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or antiepileptic drugs; or any other condition that increased the risk of seizure such as stroke, significant head injury, tumor or infection of the central nervous system, arteriovenous malformation, neuroleptic malignant syndrome/serotonin syndrome, or clinically significant, as deemed by the investigator, metabolic disorders.2
CGI-I=Clinical Global Impression-Improvement; DSM-5=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD=major depressive disorder; SDS=Sheehan Disability Scale