Clinical study overview
The GEMINI pivotal study was a Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated AUVELITY vs placebo for 6 weeks in 327 patients (N=163 AUVELITY and N=164 Placebo) with MDD. The study met its primary endpoint of symptom improvement on the MADRS total score at Week 6. Key secondary endpoints were change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 1 and Week 2, response (≥50% improvement in MADRS total score) at Week 6, and remission (MADRS total score ≤10) at Week 2.1,2 See full study design.
AUVELITY demonstrated rapid and sustained symptom improvement across multiple scales
Significant symptom improvement on the MADRS scale as early as Week 1 and sustained at Week 6 vs placebo1-3*
Efficacy across subgroups: Examination of demographic subgroups by age, sex, and race did not suggest differences on the primary endpoint.1
P-values for Weeks 3 and 4 were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were not imputed.
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates for MADRS ranged from 1.6 to 1.9 between treatment groups.4
§Endpoints analyzed using MMRM.
BID=twice a day, LS=least square; MADRS=Montgomery‑Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mITT=modified intention‑to‑treat; MMRM=mixed model with repeated measures
Significantly more patients taking AUVELITY had symptoms that were very much improved/much improved at Week 1, with this increase being sustained at Week 62,3,5,6*
P-values for Weeks 2-4 were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were considered failures.
Endpoints analyzed using a chi-squared test.
BID=twice a day; CGI-I=Clinical Global Impression-Improvement; mITT=modified intention-to-treat
Rapid and substantial symptom improvement at Week 22
MADRS Total Score ≤10 (protocol-defined remission)2*
P-values for Weeks 3, 4, and 6 were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
Significantly more patients taking AUVELITY achieved MADRS Total Score ≤10 at Week 2 vs placebo (protocol‑defined remission)
*mITT population.
Missing data were considered failures.
Endpoint analyzed using a chi‑squared test.
BID= twice a day; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mITT=modified intention-to-treat
Substantial symptom improvement at Week 62
≥50% Improvement (protocol-defined response)2*
P-values for Weeks 1-4 were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
Significantly more patients taking AUVELITY achieved ≥50% improvement in MADRS total score at Week 6 vs placebo (protocol‑defined response)
*mITT population.
Missing data were considered failures.
Endpoint analyzed using a chi-squared test.
BID=twice a day; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mITT=modified intention-to-treat
Greater reduction on the CGI-S scale from Week 1 to Week 6 vs placebo2,5,6*
P-values for Weeks 1-4 were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were not imputed.
Endpoint analyzed using a MMRM.
BID=twice a day; CGI-S=Clinical Global Impression-Severity; LS=least square; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; MMRM=mixed model with repeated measures
Patient-reported outcome measures over 6 weeks with AUVELITY2,5
Q-LES-Q-SF changes vs placebo2,5,7,8*
Enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by patients were reported in various areas of daily functioning.7,8
P-values for comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were not imputed.
BID=twice a day; LS=least square; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; Q‑LES‑Q‑SF=Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form
Improvement on Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)2,5,9*
Functioning, evaluated by SDS, was reported in the domains of work/school, social and family life.9
P-values for comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were not imputed.
BID=twice a day; LS=least square; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; SDS=Sheehan Disability Scale
Improvement on QIDS-SR-16 score vs placebo2,5,10*†
Depressive symptom severity was reported based on domains such as sleep, mood, and suicidal ideation.10
P-values for comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were not imputed.
BID=twice a day; LS=least square; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; QIDS‑SR‑16=Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology‑Self‑Report (16 items)
More patients taking AUVELITY reported being very much/much improved on the PGI-I scale at Week 1 through Week 62,3,5,11*†
Global improvement or worsening of mental illness was reported.11
P-values for comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity and are therefore not presented.
*mITT population.
Missing data were considered failures.
BID=twice a day; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; PGI-I=Patient Global Impression of Improvement
GEMINI Phase 3 Study
Primary endpoint: LS mean change from baseline in MADRS total score at Week 6.1,2
Select secondary endpoints:1,2
The following endpoints were evaluated hierarchically:
- Change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 2
- Percentage of subjects achieving remission (MADRS total score ≤10) at Week 2
- Change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 1
- Percentage of responders (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score from baseline) at Week 6
- CGI-I at Week 6
- Change in CGI-S from baseline to Week 6
- CGI-I at Week 1
- Percentage of subjects achieving remission (MADRS total score ≤10) at Week 1
- Change in SDS from baseline to Week 6
Statistical significance was achieved on the first 7 multiplicity tests (bolded above).
Other endpoints: SDS, QIDS‑SR‑16, Q‑LES‑Q‑SF, and PGI‑I.2
Efficacy assessments were performed at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 on the mITT population. The mITT population was defined as all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post‑baseline assessment.2
The MADRS is a clinician‑rated scale used to assess depressive symptom severity. Patients are rated on 10 items to assess feelings of sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, lack of interest, pessimism, and suicidality. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.1
Key inclusion criteria: Male or female 18‑65 years of age; DSM‑5 criteria for current MDD without psychotic features; MADRS total score ≥25; and CGI‑S score ≥4 at baseline.1,2
Key exclusion criteria: Bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, treatment-resistant depression (defined as ≥2 failed adequate antidepressant treatments in the current major depressive episode), alcohol/substance use disorder within the past year, clinically significant risk of suicide, and history of seizure disorder.2
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
- Demographic and baseline disease characteristics were generally similar across both treatment groups.2
- Patients had a median age of 41 years (range: 18 to 65 years), and were 67% female, 55% Caucasian, 35% Black, and 5% Asian.1
- At baseline for AUVELITY and placebo groups:2
- Mean body mass index was 29.3 kg/m2 (AUVELITY) and 29.3 kg/m2 (placebo)
- Mean MADRS total score was 33.6 (AUVELITY) and 33.2 (placebo)
- Mean CGI-S score was 4.6 for both groups
BID=twice a day; CGI‑I=Clinical Global Impression‑Improvement; CGI‑S=Clinical Global Impression‑Severity; DSM-5=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition; LS=least squares; MADRS=Montgomery‑Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mITT=modified intention-to-treat; PGI-I=Patient Global Impression of Improvement; QIDS-SR-16=Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (16 items); Q‑LES‑Q‑SF=Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form; SDS=Sheehan Disability Scale